Assigment 1b - ImageNet and MobileNet
Week2: ImageNet and MobileNet
Jianhao Ma
ImageNet
My initial impression with ImageNet is about how slow it is. But I thought that makes sense regarding it is a non-profitable research project with a huge dataset. I tried to find how big the dataset is and figured out that the statistics hasn't been updated for 10 years.
Later I realized that not only the search engine lacks consistency, the tree view is also taking forever.
As I browsed through ImageNet, I started to have a sense that it's one of those early Image Classification project that's been forbidden by time. Can't neglect that there are many privacy concerns, especially under "person" synsets. I think that they would have be more careful when selecting synsets of illegal occupations and minority groups if it's a recent project. But I wouldn't blame that on ImageNet because that's the common theme of fabricating any datasets with all resources on the Internet. It's too much works for handpicking and you cannot rely on algorithms being ethnically appropriate. That would be another essential challenge for Machine Learning: teach them to be ethical.
MobileNet
I picked 10 photos I shot recently and applied them to the p5 MobileNet image classifier, some of those images are quite abstract. The result is surprisingly good. Six images are classified correctly. Two images are given close guesses that my two year old nephew would make. However, two images are being classified as something that's not correlated at all. Those are:
In summary, objects that are bigger than 1/4 in proportion to the image are better classified; images with better lighting are better classified; and objects that have color contrasts with the backgrounds are better classified.
Comments
Post a Comment